A2 Horror Trailer - 'Inevitable'

Representation of women in horror films

            Within the horror genre, there is a clear difference in the way that men and women are represented and even though women are all represented in a similar way. Every so often there will be a women character in a horror film that challenges this representation and also challenges the theories about women’s representation in horror films. The four theories that I will focus on when exploring the representation of women in horror films are The Final Girl theory and the Male Gaze theory.

Paris Hilton's character

            Laura Mulvey had a theory about the male gaze and this theory stated the male gaze occurs when the camera puts the audience into the perspective of a heterosexual man. It may longer over the curves of a woman’s body, for instance. The woman is usually displayed on two different levels: as an erotic object for both the characters within the film, as well as the spectator who is watching the film. The man emerges as the dominant power within the created film fantasy. The woman is passive to the active gaze from the man. This adds an element of ‘patriarchal’ order and it is often seen in illusionistic narrative movie. A good example of this is in the movie House of Wax, the character portrayed by Paris Hilton who in the film is mainly dressed in revealing clothes for example the pictures which show her dressed in her underwear and a letterman jacket. The reason for her being dressed in these types of outfits are because it is said men should be attracted to her and therefore this is a good selling point for the film however it doesn’t give a good representation of a woman. This is because it shows a woman as someone who doesn’t care for dignity and she dresses in similar ways to this for men and not for themselves. It has also been said that a lot of men like to watch women getting killed in horror movies rather than men and so Paris Hilton was a good actress to put in this film. Her character was killed off by Vincent (the murderer) who throws at pipe at her character which ultimately impales her through the head.

Drew Barrymore's character

            The next theory was one by Carol Clover who came up with The Final theory and in this theory she stated that the final girl in many of these works show similar characteristics: she is typically virginal and avoids the vices of other victims such as sex, illegal drug use and the hedonistic lifestyle. The character will sometimes have a unisex name such as teddy, Sidney or Billie and it may even be that the final girl has shared some history with the killer. In the film Scream there are two characters, one who conforms to the idea of Clover’s theory and another who challenges the theory. At the beginning of Scream there is a small scene where Drew Barrymore plays her character Casey Becker and this character comes across as someone who will fit the final girl theory. This is because she is dressed so everything is covered and comes across as a very plain looking student type girl, however the convention of the final girl is broken when she receives a phone call where she is asked to answer a question in order to save her life, refusing to answer her parents find her tied to a tree by her neck with slashes in her chest. By having a character who comes across as a final girl but isn’t a final girl is a good way of showing the audience that no matter how you dress or present yourself as a woman the same fate can happen to those who present themselves differently, and this represents women in a good light through horror because Barrymore’s character in particular is a positive way to show a teenage girl. 

Neve Campbell's character

            The final girl that conforms to this theory is also in the Scream movies and this character is Sidney Prescott - played by Neve Campbell. The first sign that this character could be a final girl is that she has a unisex name and this is a common trait with final girls. As Sidney’s character possessed other traits of the final girl theory it was easy for the audience to assume that she would be either the last one to survive and this is what happened even until the end of the franchise. It turned out in the third movie of the franchise that she was in fact half brother of Roman Bridger who was revealed to be the killer. By having the sole survivor for the movies as the half brother of the killer, it makes it more obvious that this character is meant to be the final girl as it is often realised that the final girl has some sort of connection with the killer themselves. The idea of having someone like Sidney Prescott as a final girl is a good way to represent women in horror films because her character is someone who is intelligent and vigilant, and this is what helps her survive as a character.

Sigourney Weaver's character

            Another example of the Final Girl theory is from the movie franchise Alien in which the character Ellen Ripley was identified as a final girl by Carol Clover herself. Ripley follows the traits of a final girl in that way that she looks with her masculine hair style and she is characterised by Clover who said that Ripley’s character had “smartness, gravity, competence in mechanical and other practical matters, and sexual reluctance” and this was because her character worked as a ship’s mechanic and she would always reject sexual advances made by other male characters on the ship. The roles for women in society have changed slightly over the years and when Alien first come out it would have been different seeing a woman in the environment that Ripley’s character was in because typically the job that she was taking on is something that would have been done by a man because it was always seen as something that was masculine. Also through the way that her character dressed, it would have been seen as strange because she looked very masculine and as horror films and other films in general have advanced it is now more popular for the women in films to be dressed very differently to please the male eye rather than anything else. And so from all this, I think Ellen Ripley is the best representation of a final girl because of the time that her character came about, it would have been seen as a lot different and perhaps this is what has helped the movies advance in that way that there is a lot more final girls in movies now than there ever was. 

Let the Right One In Film Analysis

Let the Right One In is a 2008 Swedish romantic horror movie, directed by Tomas Alfredson. The movie was based on the 2004 novel of the same title written by John Ajvide Lindqvist, who also wrote the screenplay for the movie. The movie was produced by Carl Molinder and John Nordling and then distributed by Sandrew Metronome. When selecting who would play the main roles in the movie, it took over a year to for them to be chosen, in the end two 11 year olds Kåre Hedebrant and Lina Leandersson were chosen for the lead roles. When the movie was released in the UK, it was clear that these actors were unknown and so this made it more difficult for the movie to become successful globally. However, following the release of the movie both actors were commended by movie reviewers and Alfredson himself for their performances.

According to Todorov’s theory, a movie should go through certain stages and I think that this movie in particular does go through these stages however this movie in particular doesn’t go through the stages too quickly and so it was harder for the stages to be picked out. To begin the movie, there needs to be an equilibrium so that the audience can familiarise themselves with the characters and the settings. For this movie, it begins by showing Oskar – one of the main characters – being constantly picked on by other boys at his school and then it shows that when he goes home he sits in the courtyard where he practices knife attacks on a tree. From this the audience can assume that Oskar is willing to attack his tormentors but he doesn’t, and they can also assume that Oskar is often bullied and therefore isn’t going to stand up for himself unless it’s necessary. The next stage for an event to take place and for this movie there isn’t a clear event and this is because the other main Eli turns up and other things start happening such as people dying due to Eli. For example, she’s not very friendly towards Eli to begin with, she also goes hunting for blood to feed on and her ‘guardian’ goes hunting for blood for her as well. With all of these significant things happening in the movie, it then becomes clearer that Eli herself is the main event and this is because the next stage – which is the recognition of event – takes place when Oskar realises that Eli isn’t a girl and in fact she is a vampire. As Oskar learns that she is vampire, he questions this and when he does she begins to bleed form various places of her body as though she is proving what she is to him. In almost every movie there is a time when they try to resolve or do end up resolving the event that has taken place, however in this movie the audience think that the event has been resolved when it fact it hasn’t. Oskar see’s Eli for one more night before she moves away and this is when the audience think that she is gone for good and so from here there should be a new equilibrium. However as the end of the movie gets closer, there is a scene in which one of Oskar’s tormenters gets his older brother to give Oskar an ultimatum – as Oskar doesn’t say anything he gets his head pushed under the water in the swimming pool and after a minute or so Eli pulls Oskar from the water and the camera shows three of Oskar’s tormentors have been slaughtered. This shows the audience that Eli isn’t going away from Oskar anytime soon but in fact the new equilibrium for this movie is that Oskar doesn’t have to put up with being bullied anymore. This is shown in the last scene of the movie where Oskar is sat on a train with a basket in front of him where Eli is hidden but they are tapping Morse Code to each other through the wood of the basket.

 Audience expectations are something is taken into consideration when creating a movie but also when advertising the movie and making it appealing. If the audience like the advertising they see they will want to the movie, however through the advertising – especially the trailer – the audience will have built up an idea of what they want to see in the movie. As this is a movie that is about romance and horror, the audience will expect both of these genres to made clear when watching the movie, but as this is a movie based on a vampire, they may expect more horror than romance to be shown. I think the audience for this movie would expect the movie to contain a little bit of gore as it does have a vampire as one of the characters, but there wouldn’t be too more gore to put people off the movie. I also think it would be expected that some of the characters get killed due to the nature of the movie. However, because the movie is also a romance, the audience will be expecting a little bit of romance to be in the movie, but because the two main characters are so young, I don’t think that the audience would expect a lot of this.

 There aren’t many scenes in the movie that show the element of romance and I think that this is because the characters are so young in the movie. There is one scene where the two characters just sleep in the same bed and they also hug in various scenes but that is about as romantic as the movies gets, although the audience do know how the two characters feel about each other. As a lot of the movie is based more upon the horror elements in the movie, it means that there are more scenes that have ‘horror’ in them but many of the scenes are tame in comparison to other horror movies. There is one scene in the movie where Eli’s guardian pours chemical over himself and when we next see him in the hospital where he offers his own blood to Eli as he doesn’t want to live anymore, but the audience can see the damage to his face and so this could be considered an element of horror. We also see a couple of attack on different people throughout the movie such as when Eli bites a passerby’s neck for blood and she also attacks someone else who then turns into a vampire. However we see this person in the hospital where she opens up the curtains and bursts into flames because of the sunlight. There are also a few more scenes that are similar to these ones. Another scene that is movies with iconic things is when Eli starts bleeding from various places in her body, I think this could be considered an element of horror because it isn’t what you expect to happen and it also makes the audience want to squirm slightly.

This movie does contain a few of the functions that Propp has for character’s however some of them aren’t necessarily what the audience they are going to be when they start watching the movie. It is obvious from that start the bullies/tormentors in the movie are going to act as villains as they contain to bully Oskar until the end of the movie, but when Eli first comes into the movie, the audience can’t be sure on whether she is going to be a villain also because she is a vampire. However as the movie goes on, the audience could place Eli into the villain category for the fact that she kills a lot of people, but in the end it turns out that Eli was more of a hero than anyone else in the movie because she saves him from being drowned by the bullies at the end of the movie. This is an unusual character type because for a hero of a movie, it wouldn’t be expected that the 12 year old vampire would fit the category and I think this is hat separates this movie from other horror movies. For Oskar’s character I think he becomes a helper in the movie because he allows Eli to be herself and he doesn’t run away from her when he knows the truth but he also doesn’t tell everyone what she is and what she has done to other people; he could also be considered a victim due to all the bullying that he got put through before Eli killed the tormentors. There is also another helper in the movie, I think, and this is Håkan because he sacrifices himself for the sake of Eli and besides Oskar there isn’t anyone else in the movie that would have done this for her. With all these different characters in place, I think that this movie does conform to most of Propp’s ideas about characters and the functions that they provide in the movie and I think is something that lets the audience connect to the characters easier.

 There isn’t much of an opposition in this movie that it made obvious and so I don’t think that it conforms to Strauss’s theory of binary opposition. However, if there was to be any type of opposition in the movie, I would think it would be either Good vs. Evil in terms of Oskar and his bullies, but also Eli and all her victims even if she does turn out to be a hero. There is also the opposition of youth vs. age but I don’t think this plays a large part in the movie and so I wouldn’t say that this works in Strauss’ theory however it does show a clear difference between Oskar and Eli themselves because one is a lot more insightful compared to the other. Also with Oskar and Eli as the main characters, it could also be said that there is an opposition in the way that it’s the supernatural world vs. the real world but I don’t think that any of these oppositions play a part big enough in the movie to be considered part of Strauss’ theory about binary opposition.

 In conclusion this is a movie that conforms to many theories and the typical elements that should be found in a horror but sometimes these are gone about in a different way to other movies. The thing that makes this movie unique is that even though it does conform, it is a different movie with a different way of approaching things, for example not many horror movies have a 12 year old girl as the hero of the movie, so I think that this is what makes this movie successful and different.

Question 1: In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?

Production/Distribution Companies

         For programmes on TV and movies to be released both in cinema and on DVD, production companies play a large role in this and if it weren’t for the productions companies a lot of media types wouldn’t be around. Production companies are responsible for the fundraising a specific production, they handle the budgeting, scheduling, scripting, marketing, the organisation of staff, post-production, distribution, the supply of talent and resources and the production itself. The production company is usually run by a producer or a director, but it can also be run by a career executive and in entertainment, a production company will rely highly on talent or a well known entertainment franchise to raise the value of a project therefore drawing it out to larger audiences.

            The marketing and advertising of a product plays a large part in how popular it becomes, for example if a movie has a lot of advertisement, more people are likely to go and watch it compared with a smaller film that has had hardly any advertisement. It also depends on how the product in this case a movie is advertised to how many people go and watch it, and the range in people that go to watch it. The main methods in advertising is billboard with posters, TV and radio adverts, advertisements on social networking sites and much more, by having so many different ways of advertising one product it means that the product can attract a wider audience and therefore become more popular. But it also means that if someone doesn’t go on social networking sites, they are still likely to the see the advert elsewhere and vice versa, as well as gaining an audience globally that are filled with different types of people ranging in age, gender and much more. The only problem with advertising is that production companies have to continue research all the time and this means that trends change quickly and advertising has to move with it, therefore more and more advertising methods have been created.

            Production companies also have a way of publicising products and this is usually through the advertising, however it won’t be regular advertising, instead they’ll advertise a product using a well known face – usually a celebrity of some sort – and this will make audiences want to buy the product as they will want to aspire to be like that certain celebrity. An example of this way of advertising is the Sharpie Company who for many of their adverts used David Beckham and this was so that people would want to go and buy the pens as they would believe that David Beckham uses them same pens too. Something that movies usually do is use actors in the movie that are familiar to the audience because they can then make this/these actors the spotlight for all the advertising, they will place them centrally on the poster and make sure they are seen throughout most of the trailer. This is a good way to gain publicity both for the product and the actor themselves because if the actor is popular already it means more people are likely to go and watch the film, and if it a small but recognisable actor it means that they will gain more fans through the advertising of the movie that they are in. 

            Distribution is also something that Production companies take care of but the film distributor can be a company or individual representative. The distributors control the marketing and circulation of a movie whether it is in the theatre or for home viewing and so they can control how a movie is shown and therefore how it is advertised. As a distributor to make the film successful is very important and so often they will arrange screening for exhibitors as well as other marketing techniques in order to make sure that the film will be as successful as possible. The film distributors can also control where the movie will be shown and how long it will be available to see on screen for and this then determines how much money is made during its run at the theatre. The distributors can then monitor how many people are going to watch the movie and this will then control whether it is shown for as long or if it needs more viewing time and also whether they need to widen the amount of theatres it is being shown in or in some cases, lessen the amount of the theatres it is being shown in. 

Scary Movie 2 Film Analysis

Scary Movie 2 is a 2001 parody movie, and is the second movie in the Scary Movie franchise. The director for this movie was Keenen Ivory Wayans and the screenplay was written by eight people in total. Eric L. Gold produced the movie which was then distributed by Dimension Films. Scary Movie 2 contains some of the same characters who were in the previous movie but apart from these, there are no actors who are well-known in the movie; instead it uses smaller actors, some of these being Anna Faris as Cindy, Regina Hall as Brenda, Shawn Wayans as Ray and Marlon Wayans as Shorty – who all featured in the first movie of the franchise.

            I think that this movie follows some of the rules from Todorov’s narrative theory, but not necessarily in the order constructed by Todorov himself. The start of the movie doesn’t have any relevance to the storyline of Scary Movie 2 and instead is a parody of The Exorcist. The beginning to the storyline of the movie is a year on from the last Scary Movie, and the four characters from the previous movie – Cindy, Shorty, Brenda and Ray – are all at college and are trying to start a new life after the events that happened in the last movie and so this is the starting equilibrium for the movie. By having this is as the equilibrium, it means those audiences who didn’t watch the previous movie can become familiar with who the main characters of the movie are going to be and it also shows that something is going to happen with these characters because life is so normal for them at the time. The next stage is for an event to take place and in this case, the students Professor asks them to go on a trip to a haunted house, unbeknown to the students that they would be bait for the paranormal activity that takes place in the house. The teens eventually find out about their Professors plans after all the incidents that have taken place in the house and this is the next stage in Todorov’s theory where the event is recognised, and so from this the next stage has to be revealed and this is where there is an attempt to fix the problem or the event that has just taken place. The teens attempt to fix the event that has just taken place by equipping themselves with several technological devices that will injure the spectral enemies in the Hell House. Eventually the teens manage to lure Kane the ghost toward a device that destroys him all whilst destroying a skeleton, and a possessed Hanson. Two months later, there is a new equilibrium where the teens are all back in college, Cindy and Buddy are in a relationship and look after the parrot from the Hell House, however Cindy see’s Hanson again and the movie ends with Hanson getting run over and killed for good by Shorty. By leaving the movie without a real sense of a new equilibrium like Todorov’s theory says should happen, it makes the audience think there a movie could be made to follow this one.

            When watching a movie, the audience always have in mind the types of things that should be in the movie depending on the genre of it, for example a comedy movie is expected to have a lot of comedic moment otherwise it wouldn’t fit the genre, and sometimes two genre cross each other and this is what happens in this movie because they are some parody moment in it, as well as it being a horror and comedy. So for this movie to be successful, the movie had to marketed right and attract the right audience, this is made easier as it is a sequel and so the producers know what to put into the movie and so this makes the expectations a little less pressurising. For a movie of so many genres, the audience will expect aspects from all the genres to be in it – mainly comedy and horror – so the audience will expect it to have slight elements of horror but nothing to horrific because it will have the comedy factor to it and I think for this movie, it is more about the comedy side of things rather than the horror side. But because this is the second movie in the franchise, the audience will expect the ideas to have advanced from last time and I think they would expect the movie to be funnier and have new jokes in it.

            There are a few scenes in the movie that hold a small element of horror but most of the movie is based on the comedy genre and so a lot of the scenes hold elements of horror more than anything. Two scenes in the movie are parodies of other movies and these are; the start of the movie consists of a parody from The Exorcist and towards the end of the movie there is a scene where Cindy, Theo and Brenda fight a possessed Hanson and it turns into a parody scene from Charlie’s Angels. The scenes that hold an element of horror are when the skeleton chases Cindy, the ghosts who create incidents in the house and the housekeeper at Hell House is also weird looking and so is there to creep the audience out. These are some of the only horror elements that are in the movie. Most of the movie is built up on comedy and so the whole movie is based on jokes and taking something that shouldn’t necessarily be funny and making it humorous for the audience. Parody movies were a genre of movie that was often overlooked but it is now one of the most commonly profitable at the box office, and so by bringing this element to the movie, it means that the movie should become quite successful at the box office. And horror-comedies have also recently become more popular and so by bringing elements of this genre into the movie it means that there aren’t too many expectations as at the time of its release the genre wasn’t too popular.

            According to Propp’s Character Functions, the audience should be able to pick out a clear victim, villain, hero and many other characters. For this movie in particular the Professor seems like a normal character at the start of the movie and we get further into the storyline it becomes clear to the audience that this is not the case, and in fact the Professor could be seen as the villain for the movie. This is because he uses the students as bait for his project and he also hopes that he’ll get something from the college girls that he takes on the trip with him – the Professor eventually gets killed by a female ghost who lives in the mansion. The Professor has a helper who the audience can assume will also be villainous as they will think he helped in the plans that the Professor had but once the Professor is killed, it turns out that Dwight is willing to help the students try and escape the mansion whilst killing all the ghosts in the process and so he is the helper for the movie as he provides the students with the weapons they need to defend themselves with. Due to all the students being taken away to mansion for bait, it can be said that they are all victims in this movie but at the same time they all become hero’s because they manage to escape with help and they also manage to kill all the ghosts and stop the paranormal activity that goes on in the Hell House. Shorty continues to be a hero right until the end of the movie where Hanson is back to get Cindy but before he can do that Shorty runs him over and kills him for good. I think that this movie does conform to some of Propp’s ideas about character functions; some of them are just less obvious in the movie.

            There is a clear of opposition of Good vs. Evil in this movie and this shown through the way that the students are all on the good side and the Professor along with all the other things in the house such as the cat that attacks Cindy, the large weed plant, all the ghosts and even the toy clown that comes to life are on the evil side. We see the fight between these oppositions take place towards the end of the film in which the students manage to defeat the evil side and so it can be clearly seen that Strauss’ theory works in the case of the movie.

            In conclusion, this is a movie that conforms to many of the typical elements that are needed in it and is a prime example of a film that uses a narrative structure, the idea of binary opposites and character functions. I think that if the film hadn’t followed these conventions then it wouldn’t have been as successful therefore all these theories are an important piece to this movie. The typical aspects such as the comedy and the fact that it parodies other films is what mainly made the film so successful globally and this is why audiences have wanted more films from the Scary Movie franchise. 

Saw II Film Analysis

Saw II is a Canadian-American horror movie that was released in October 2005. The director for this movie was Darren Lynn Bousman, who also contributed to some of the screenplay along with Leigh Whannell. Gregg Hoffman, Mark Burg and Oren Koules all contributed to the production of this horror movie and it was then distributed by Lionsgate. Saw II doesn’t contain any well-known stars and instead uses smaller actors, some of these being; Donnie Wahlberg who plays the corrupted police officer; Erik Knudsen as the Eric the police officers son; Tobin Bell as John otherwise known as Jigsaw and Amanda Young who plays Shawnee – a player of the game.

I think that this movie follows some of the rules from Todorov’s narrative theory however it is a more unusual approach to the structured theory. The beginning of the movie doesn’t have much relevance to the rest of the storyline and so therefore I wouldn’t say that this is the movies starting equilibrium, instead the equilibrium for the movie is the next scene where two people can be seen arguing to which one of them leaves and the other (who is a Detective) is soon called away to a scene of a death. Up until this point, it would seem that this is something that regularly happens and therefore the storyline is showing a normal life. However, the crime scene that the Detective is called away to is what is significant to the rest of the storyline because the symbol of a padlock can be seen on the device around the victim’s neck and this becomes the signifier for other deaths and also for the murderer. The next stage in the theory is an event and this event is the kidnapping of 8 people who have been put in a house full of saw traps and this is then recognised when the SWAT team of detectives follow the clues from the last death and find what they think is live CCTV footage from a house where all the victims are being kept – one of these victims being the main Detectives son, and this acts as the next stage to Todorov’s theory where the event is recognised. The next stage to the theory isn’t ever fully completed, because most of the people who are kidnapped don’t make it out of the house and the house is never found instead it turns out one of the people who were kidnapped was in with Jigsaw and the son of the Detective is found in a safe. To finish the movie there isn’t much showing of a new equilibrium instead it shows the Detective in his own saw trap and the audience don’t know whether he makes it out or not. I think that the narrative for the movie follows some of the stages of Todorov’s theory however they aren’t always in the right order and some of the stages are missed out completely or never finished.

When an audience go to watch any genre of movie, they almost always know what to expect unless it is a completely new genre. This is mainly because every genre of movie has its own elements that make it recognisable to an audience which makes marketing the movie a lot easier – for example being able to attract the right audience. Due to this movie being part of the horror genre it is clear that there will be certain expectations such as for it to be horrific and terrify the audience and how it does this varies. For this movie in particular, it would be expected that it will contain elements of gore and gore that is advanced due to the aspects that the previous movie held. As this movie is a sequel to the first Saw, I think that audience would expect it to have a lot more gore than the previous movie and more advanced trap ideas. As well as this they may also expect to find certain character from the previous movie also.

There are a lot of scenes in the movie that hold a lot of gore and this is the main aspect of this movie that allows the audience to know that it is a horror. The Saw movies are made of many different traps and this is the main element of horror in the movies, for Saw II specifically, there were around 9 different traps. One of the more horrific traps for this movie was ‘The Needle Pit’ and this consisted of the middle of a room being filled with used syringes, and one of the victims had to jump into the pit and find the key to unlock the door and gain another antidote, the idea of the trap was that it would be like “finding a needle in a haystack.” Another one of the traps that was used in this movie was ‘The Nerve Gas House’ which was the large trap that has other traps inside of it, for this trap all the victims awoke in a house where they were breathing in a deadly gas to which they had to find the antidotes in each of the smaller traps in order to survive. This trap required all the victims to work together and this is something that doesn’t happen and if the audience have watched the precious Saw movie, will know won’t happen and therefore a lot of deaths take place. All the elements that make this movie a horror, is what allows it to be placed in the gore category for the history of horror movies and as more movies are made, we expect more gore to come out of them.

As an audience, it is unclear of who is a victim and who is a villain (Propp’s Character Functions) in the movie to begin with, this is because we think these people have been placed in the trapped house are victims of Jigsaw’s plans when in fact they have all been put there with reasoning which could lead the audience to believe that they are villains in some ways. One of the characters who has been best displayed is Amanda because throughout the movie, the audience believe that she becomes a victim of the other kidnappers attacks (she was also in the previous Saw movie) and it isn’t until the end of the movie that the audience find out she had been one of the villains all along and has been helping in Jigsaw’s plans – she also ends of locking Detective Matthews in ‘The Bathroom Trap’ where he is left to die. The main villain for this movie and the audience know this because he is the one who knows where the Nerve Gas House and he is the one who planned the kidnapping of the people who have been put in the house. However, even when the movie has ended, the audience are still unclear on whether Detective Matthews is a victim or not, this is because he doesn’t come across as having any victim like qualities and in one scene, he beats up Jigsaw and so he wouldn’t come across as a character who is a victim in the movie, but at the end he is placed in a trap and so in this sense he is a victim but the reasons for him being put in the trap could lead to him being seen as more of a villain – although throughout the movie, many audiences will be on the side of what seems the corrupt Detective.

According to Strauss’ theory of binary opposition, a movie should show an opposition and for this movie it could be the idea of Good vs. Evil, however the whole movie does conform to this idea and it challenges it in a lot of ways. For example, it is uncertain whether some characters are victims or not and so it can’t be seen whether they are trying to defeat ‘evil.’ This means that the audience can’t be sure what is ‘good’ and what is ‘evil’ and so it’s not until the end of the movie whether it can be determined that good had triumphed evil or vice versa.

In conclusion, Saw II is a movie that doesn’t follow too many conventions of movies in terms of its characters and its narrative, however it does follow the conventions that make it a horror movie and this could be seen as the most important aspect because without these aspects, the movie wouldn’t be a horror. It’s the typical aspects such as the tension and the questioning of what will happen next and who will survive throughout the movie, along with the settings for the movie such as the abandoned and secluded house as well the fact that the movie doesn’t use a lot of lighting and so this is creates a creepier environment. With all the elements that Saw does hold, I think this is what has helped it become a successful film globally and this is why there is a demand for more movies similar to it.